Größe: 818
Kommentar:
|
Größe: 8790
Kommentar:
|
Gelöschter Text ist auf diese Art markiert. | Hinzugefügter Text ist auf diese Art markiert. |
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: |
#acl AdminGroup:admin,read,write,delete,revert UserGroup:read,write GuestGroup:read All:read |
|
Zeile 3: | Zeile 5: |
{{{#!wiki red/solid ==== USE OF THE DATA ==== The data here are provided free of charge and you are free to use them as you like, provided you confer to thte following '''<<Color(red: terms and conditions)>>''' 1. The data have been carefully quality checked as described below. However, we do not give any guarantee whatsoever with respect to the accuracy of the data and information provided, and under no circumstances will we accept liability claims (if you do find or suspect errors or inconsistencies, please let us know and we will try to fix it). 2. The data are acquired and provided by '''Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute for Energy and Climate Research, IEK-7: Stratosphere''', which should be acknowledged with any use of the data. 3. In case the data are used extensively (i.e. representing a major contribution) in a scientific publication, please consider offering co-authorship to those making the efforts to acquire and quality check these data. 4. CONTACT: '''[[mailto:m.von.hobe@fz-juelich.de|Marc von Hobe, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, IEK-7, Tel.: +49 2461 614620]]''' }}} ------ |
|
Zeile 10: | Zeile 22: |
||'''Month'''||'''Graph'''||'''Data file'''||'''Accuracy'''||'''Precision'''||'''Remarks'''|| ||May 2014|| || || || || || ||Apr 2014|| || || || || || ||Mar 2014|| || || || || || ||Feb 2014|| || || || || || |
||<#8080FF> '''Month'''||<#8080FF> '''Graph'''||<#8080FF> '''Data file'''||<#8080FF> '''Accuracy~-^1^-~'''||<#8080FF> '''Precision~-^2^-~'''||<#8080FF> '''Remarks'''|| ||<#E0E0FF> Sep 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_09.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_09.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-4.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.7 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Aug 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_08.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_08.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-4.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.6 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Jul 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_07.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_07.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-4.0 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.7 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Jun 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_06.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_06.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-5.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.6 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> May 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_05.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_05.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-2.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.6 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Apr 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_04.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_04.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-4.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.6 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Mar 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_03.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_03.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +4.5/-2.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.5 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.003 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Feb 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fgga2014_02.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj100m_2014_02.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +/- 4.5 ppm-~||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.6 ppm <<BR>> CH,,4,,: 0.004 ppm -~||<#E0E0FF> || ~- The FGGA is compared to a CO,,2,, standard gas approximately every two weeks. There are currently no standards for CH,,4,, and H,,2,,O. However, because it is a direct spectroscopic method over entire absorption lines with known line characteristics, accuracy for all gases is expected to fall within 2 %. -~ <<BR>> ~- ^1^Accuracy is given here in terms of the maximum deviation between FGGA and the CO,,2,, standard, combined with the 2.5 ppm uncertainty of the standard. -~ <<BR>> ~- ^2^Instrument presision is determined as the standard deviation determined during the standard measurements. -~ <<BR>> Full specifications of the Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer are found [[http://www.lgrinc.com/analyzers/overview.php?prodid=23&type=gas|here]] (note that ours is the 2009 model, not the current one). == 20 m Platform, Mid Infrared Cavity Enhanced Spectrometer (MICA) CO2, CO, H2O == Past data starting from February 2014 can be downloaded from the table below. Data are grouped in monthly files of 10-minute averages. <<BR>> If you would like to get older data or data with higher time resolution, please contact [[mailto:m.von.hobe@fz-juelich.de|Marc von Hobe]]. ||<#8080FF> '''Month'''||<#8080FF> '''Graph'''||<#8080FF> '''Data file'''||<#8080FF> '''Accuracy~-^1^-~'''||<#8080FF> '''Precision~-^2^-~'''||<#8080FF> '''Remarks'''|| ||<#E0E0FF> Sep 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_09.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_09.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +4.5/-7.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.3 ppm -~||<|6 #E0E0FF> ~- Due to the temporary absence of the MICA instrument (for a ship cruise in the Indian Ocean), CO,,2,, measurements from 2. April, 12:35 utc have been made by a [[http://www.lgrinc.com/analyzers/overview.php?prodid=14&type=isotope|Carbon Dioxide Isotope Analyzer]] (2009 model). -~ <<BR>><<BR>> ~- <<Color(red: Starting in mid-May, there have been problems with the internal pressure regulation. The resulting CO2 bias has been experimentally determined and data have been corrected, introducing an additional uncertainty of about 2 ppm, which has been added to the accuracy in this table. Because pressure changes are slow, precision is not affected. At cavity pressure below 22 hPa, the corrections function is not well understood, and data were discarded when the pressure dropped below this value.)>> -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> Aug 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_08.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_08.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +4.5/-7.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.3 ppm -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> Jul 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_07.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_07.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +4.5/-7.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.3 ppm -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> Jun 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_06.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_06.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +7.5/-4.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.3 ppm -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> May 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_05.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_05.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +4.5/-12.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.4 ppm -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> Apr 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:ccia2014_04.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_04.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-6.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.4 ppm -~|| ||<#E0E0FF> Mar 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:mica2014_03.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_03.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +2.5/-2.5 ppm-~ ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.4 ppm <<BR>> CO: 2.3 ppb -~||<#E0E0FF> || ||<#E0E0FF> Feb 2014||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:mica2014_02.png]] ||<#E0E0FF> [[attachment:fzj20m_2014_02.csv]] ||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: +3.5/-2.5 ppm-~||<#E0E0FF>~- CO,,2,,: 0.5 ppm <<BR>> CO: 2.3 ppb -~||<#E0E0FF> || ~- The instrument is compared to a CO,,2,, standard gas approximately every two weeks. There are currently no standards for CO and H,,2,,O. However, because it is a direct spectroscopic method over entire absorption lines with known line characteristics, accuracy for all gases is expected to fall within 2 %. -~ <<BR>> ~- ^1^Accuracy is given here in terms of the maximum deviation between MICA and the CO,,2,, standard, combined with the 2.5 ppm uncertainty of the standard. -~ <<BR>> ~- ^2^Instrument presision is determined as the standard deviation determined during the standard measurements. -~ <<BR>> == Meteorological data == An overview of the meteorological data measured at the FZJ tower is given at [[http://www.fz-juelich.de/gs/DE/UeberUns/Organisation/S-U/Meteorologie/wetter/wetterdaten_node.html]]. These data are also archived in 10-minute-averages and can be obtained from [[mailto:A.Knaps@fz-juelich.de|Dr. Axel Knaps]]. ------ == Our Team == __Current operation and maintenance of ICOS instruments__: MarcVonHobe, CorinnaKloss, NicoleSpelten, AnneRichter (all IEK-7) Special thanks to former IEK-7 student Stephanie Schrade, who carried out the original installations of the analyzers at the meteorological tower ------ |
Trace gas observations with Los Gatos ICOS Analyzers on the FZJ meteorological tower
USE OF THE DATA
The data here are provided free of charge and you are free to use them as you like, provided you confer to thte following terms and conditions
- The data have been carefully quality checked as described below. However, we do not give any guarantee whatsoever with respect to the accuracy of the data and information provided, and under no circumstances will we accept liability claims (if you do find or suspect errors or inconsistencies, please let us know and we will try to fix it).
The data are acquired and provided by Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute for Energy and Climate Research, IEK-7: Stratosphere, which should be acknowledged with any use of the data.
- In case the data are used extensively (i.e. representing a major contribution) in a scientific publication, please consider offering co-authorship to those making the efforts to acquire and quality check these data.
CONTACT: Marc von Hobe, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, IEK-7, Tel.: +49 2461 614620
100 m Platform, Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer, CO2, CH4, H2O
Near real time data of the past 24 hours can be viewed here.
Past data starting from February 2014 can be downloaded from the table below. Data are grouped in monthly files of 10-minute averages.
If you would like to get older data or data with higher time resolution, please contact Marc von Hobe.
Month |
Graph |
Data file |
Accuracy1 |
Precision2 |
Remarks |
Sep 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-4.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.7 ppm |
|
||
Aug 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-4.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.6 ppm |
|
||
Jul 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-4.0 ppm |
CO2: 0.7 ppm |
|
||
Jun 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-5.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.6 ppm |
|
||
May 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-2.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.6 ppm |
|
||
Apr 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-4.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.6 ppm |
|
||
Mar 2014 |
CO2: +4.5/-2.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.5 ppm |
|
||
Feb 2014 |
CO2: +/- 4.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.6 ppm |
|
The FGGA is compared to a CO2 standard gas approximately every two weeks. There are currently no standards for CH4 and H2O. However, because it is a direct spectroscopic method over entire absorption lines with known line characteristics, accuracy for all gases is expected to fall within 2 %.
1Accuracy is given here in terms of the maximum deviation between FGGA and the CO2 standard, combined with the 2.5 ppm uncertainty of the standard.
2Instrument presision is determined as the standard deviation determined during the standard measurements.
Full specifications of the Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer are found here (note that ours is the 2009 model, not the current one).
20 m Platform, Mid Infrared Cavity Enhanced Spectrometer (MICA) CO2, CO, H2O
Past data starting from February 2014 can be downloaded from the table below. Data are grouped in monthly files of 10-minute averages.
If you would like to get older data or data with higher time resolution, please contact Marc von Hobe.
Month |
Graph |
Data file |
Accuracy1 |
Precision2 |
Remarks |
Sep 2014 |
CO2: +4.5/-7.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.3 ppm |
Due to the temporary absence of the MICA instrument (for a ship cruise in the Indian Ocean), CO2 measurements from 2. April, 12:35 utc have been made by a Carbon Dioxide Isotope Analyzer (2009 model). |
||
Aug 2014 |
CO2: +4.5/-7.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.3 ppm |
|||
Jul 2014 |
CO2: +4.5/-7.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.3 ppm |
|||
Jun 2014 |
CO2: +7.5/-4.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.3 ppm |
|||
May 2014 |
CO2: +4.5/-12.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.4 ppm |
|||
Apr 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-6.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.4 ppm |
|||
Mar 2014 |
CO2: +2.5/-2.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.4 ppm |
|
||
Feb 2014 |
CO2: +3.5/-2.5 ppm |
CO2: 0.5 ppm |
|
The instrument is compared to a CO2 standard gas approximately every two weeks. There are currently no standards for CO and H2O. However, because it is a direct spectroscopic method over entire absorption lines with known line characteristics, accuracy for all gases is expected to fall within 2 %.
1Accuracy is given here in terms of the maximum deviation between MICA and the CO2 standard, combined with the 2.5 ppm uncertainty of the standard.
2Instrument presision is determined as the standard deviation determined during the standard measurements.
Meteorological data
An overview of the meteorological data measured at the FZJ tower is given at http://www.fz-juelich.de/gs/DE/UeberUns/Organisation/S-U/Meteorologie/wetter/wetterdaten_node.html. These data are also archived in 10-minute-averages and can be obtained from Dr. Axel Knaps.
Our Team
Current operation and maintenance of ICOS instruments: MarcVonHobe, CorinnaKloss, NicoleSpelten, AnneRichter (all IEK-7)
Special thanks to former IEK-7 student Stephanie Schrade, who carried out the original installations of the analyzers at the meteorological tower